Исследования локальных сообществ в контексте позитивизма, субъективизма, постмодернизма и теории глобализации

Мария Сергеевна Добрякова

Ссылка при цитировании


Добрякова М. С. Исследования локальных сообществ в контексте позитивизма, субъективизма, постмодернизма и теории глобализации // Социология: методология, методы, математическое моделирование (4М), 2001. № 13. C. 27-59.

Аннотация


В статье анализируется различное восприятие локального сообщества как объекта исследования с позиций позитивизма, субъективизма, постмодернизма и теории глобализации. Предпринимается попытка обосновать утверждение о том, что критическое восприятие исследования зависит от методологического контекста, современного исследованию. Анализ выполнен на основании исследований социальной стратификации в рамках локального сообщества.

Ключевые слова


локальное сообщество; методология; позитивизм; субъективизм; постмодернизм; глобальное; локальное; социальная стратификация

Полный текст:

PDF

Литература


Буравой М. Развернутое монографическое исследование: между позитивизмом и постмодернизмом//Альманах социальных исследований “Рубеж”, 1997. №10-11. С. 154-176.

Arensberg C.M., Kimball S.T. Community study: Retrospect and prospect//The Sociology of Community: A Selection of Readings. L.:William Clowes and Sons, Ltd., 1974. P. 335-355.

Bell C., Newby H. Community Studies. London:George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1971.

Bennett J.W. The study of cultures: A survey technique and methodology in field work//American Sociological Review, 1948. Vol.13. №6. Р. 672-689.

Bourdieu P. Social space and symbolic power//Sociological Theory, 1989. Vol.7. №1. P. 14-25.

Cicourel A. The Acquisition of Social Structure toward a Developmental Sociology of Language and Meaning//Understanding Everyday Life: Toward the Reconstruction of Social Knowledge. Chicago:Aldine. P. 136-168.

Crapanzano V. “Hermes” Dilemma: The Masking of Subversion in Ethnographic Description//Writing culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley:University of California Press, 1986. P. 51-76.

Davis A., Gardner B., Gardner M. Deep South: A Social Anthropological Study of Caste and Class. Chicago:Chicago University Press, 1946.

Dollard J. Caste and Class in a Southern Town. New Haven:Yale University Press, 1937.

Fontana A. Ethnographic trends in the Postmodern Era//Postmodernism and Social Inquiry. Washington:University of Columbia Press, 1994. P. 203-223.

Geertz C. Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as an Author. Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press, 1988.

Gellner E. Postmodernism, Reason and Religion. London:Routledge, 1992.

Giddens A. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge:Polity Press, 1990.

Hillery G.A. Jr. Definitions of Community: Areas of Agreement//Rural Sociology, 1955. Vol.20. №2.

Lipset S.M., Bendix R. Social status and social structure: A Reexamination of the data and the interpretations//British Journal of Sociology, 1951. №1. P. 156.

Lynd R.S., Lynd H.M. Middletown: A Study in Contemporary American Culture. N.Y.:Harcourt, Brace and World, 1929.

Lynd R.S., Lynd H.M. Middletown in Transition: A Study in Cultural Conflicts. N.Y.:Harcourt, Brace and World, 1937.

Lyotard J.-F. La condition postmoderne: rapport sur le savoir. Paris:Les Editions de Minuit, 1979.

Manning P. Strands in the Postmodernism Rope: Oxymorons in the Desert//Paper presented at the Society for the Study of Symbolic Interaction Action Meetings, San Francisco, 21-24 August, 1989.

Marcus G.E., Fischer M.J. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1986.

Mills W.C. [review] The Social Life of a Modern Community//American Sociological Review, 1942. Vol.7. №2. P. 263-271.

Pfautz H.W., Duncan O.D. A critical evaluation of Warner’s work in community stratification//American Sociological Review, 1950. Vol.15. №2. P. 205-215.

Rorty R. Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays, 1972-1980. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.

Schmid R. [review] Deep South by A.Davis, B.Gardner and M.Gardner//American Sociological Review, 1942. Vol.7. №2. P. 261-263.

Schwartz H., Jakobs J. Qualitative Sociology: A Method to the Madness. N.Y.:The Free Press, 1979.

Sociology of Community: A Selection of Readings/Ed. by C.Bell, H.Newby. L.:William Clowes and Sons, Ltd., 1974.

Stacey M. The myth of community studies//Sociology of community: A selection of readings. L.:William Clowes & Sons, Ltd. 1974.

Swanson G.E. [review] Social Class in America: A Manual of Procedure for the Measurement of Social Status//American Sociological Review, 1949. Vol.14. №6. P. 823.

Thernstorm S. “Yankee City” Revisited: The Perils of Historical Naivete//Sociology of community: A selection of readings. L.:William Clowes & Sons, Ltd. 1974. P 293-306.

Van Maanen H. Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. Chicago:Univerisity of Chicago Press, 1988.

Warner L., Lunt P.S. The Social Life of a Modern Community. New Haven:Yale University Press, 1941.

Warner L., Lunt P.S. The Status System of a Modern Community. New Haven:Yale University Press, 1942.

Warner L., Srole L. The Social Systems of American Ethnic Groups. New Haven:Yale University Press, 1945.

Warner L., Low J.O. The Social System of the Modern Factory. The Strike: A Social Analysis. New Haven:Yale University Press, 1947.

Warner L. et al. Democracy in Jonesville. N.Y.:Harper & Row Publishers, 1949.

Warner L. The Living and the Dead: A Study of the Symbolic Life of Americans. New Haven:Yale University Press, 1959.

Warner L. The modern community as a laboratory//Sociology of community: A selection of readings. L.:William Clowes & Sons, Ltd. 1974. P. 273-281.

Warner L., Meeker M., Eels K. Social Class in America: A Manual for Procedure for the Measurement of Social Class. Chicago:Science Research Associates, 1949.

Warren R.L. The Community in America. Chicago:Chicago University Press, 1978.

West J. Plainville, USA. N.Y.:Columbia University Press, 1948.

Writing culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography/Ed. by J.Clifford, G.E.Marcus. Berkeley:University of California Press, 1986.


Ссылки

  • Ссылки не определены.